An interview I did originally posted at http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9219561/Peer_to_peer_wireless_network_could_help_in_disasters,
Peer-to-peer, wireless network could help in disasters
LifeNet open-source software would link devices via Wi-Fi, professor says
With a recent earthquake and devastation from Hurricane Irene, many cell phone users on the East Coast experienced clogged networks that made wireless calling difficult.
The wireless carriers urged users to rely on texting or email to communicate if voice calls didn’t work. Home phones using wired networks were also affected by Irene, although many homeowners are removing their wired phones to save money. More than 25% of all homes in the U.S. no longer have a wired home phone, according to the FCC.
Some question whether relying on texting or emailing in a storm is enough, and whether other emerging technologies might help. Satellite phones are one option, but they are relatively expensive. Another option is the old-fashioned two-way radio that runs on amateur-radio and public-safety bands.
In the future, one Georgia Tech professor envisions greater reliance on device-to-device communications using typical consumer phones after a disaster. Computer science professor Santosh Vempala has developed LifeNet, which uses free open source software to allow consumer devices such as laptops, Android phones and battery-powered routers to form ad hoc Wi-Fi, peer-to-peer networks without the need to work with cellular towers or base stations.
While the software is available for download, Vempala said in an interview that it is still a working prototype, which was demonstrated recently at the SigComm conference in Toronto. The demonstrations provoked interest by public safety groups that want to expand the technologies available to them after a disaster occurs, he said.
“Even though cell towers are wireless, most of the communications are through a single path, so one person connects through a particular cell tower,” Vempala explained. “In a disaster, a lot of people are trying to reach a small number of cell towers and things get congested.”
Portable cell towers are often how the carriers add capacity during emergencies, but Vempala said “over the long term, a different approach would be better.”
Instead of having a cell phone calling along one pathway to a cell tower, LifeNet coordinates multiple paths to other cell phone or laptop users on the same block or area using Wi-Fi. Part of what LifeNet provides is an algorithm to determine if a nearby device has the power and bandwidth to forward data packets to another device, which would then forward the packets until the message reaches the intended recipient, Vempala said.
Since the ad hoc network would not function on the traditional cellular network, the carriers would not be able to charge for the service. But Vempala said the carriers could arrange to have a kind of “disaster mode” in cell phones that would stay on for a limited time or limited number of relays during an emergency.
While LifeNet is in its early stages, one veteran disaster responder for the American Red Cross said the concept sounds similar to other peer-to-peer technologies already deployed though not widely used.
Keith Robertory, manager of national disaster emergency communications for the American Red Cross in Washington, said he has used robust peer-to-peer wireless systems in recent years that will forward a message through other radios. One that operates on the amateur radio band has a time-out feature built in so that the message does not keep repeating itself indefinitely. The peer-to-peer concept is sound, he said, but hasn’t been widely used.
Robertory said resilience and ease-of-use will matter to disaster responders for LifeNet to be successful. Still, he tends to avoid using emerging technologies at the Red Cross in favor of more tried and true approaches.